Evaluation

Within my work my script and storyboard match up and work well to explain what is happening within the scene and give every angle, I worked hard to make sure it was understandable and that the reader could understand not only the plot of the scene but exactly what was happening at each point as well so where a camera was angled, where an interactive scene began and so on.

The quality of my script I think was very good because it explained what needed explaining in order to make it obvious to the reader what was happening, if for example someone decided to act the scene out I made sure that it was completely obvious on what speaking needed to be done and where and what movements needed to be done.

The dialogue I used to write my script and storyboard was of a good standard and in a professional format to ensure everything was up to standard and correct.

 Along the production process, I worked to ensure that all of my ideas were detailed and worked on enough to secure a well thought out idea so that everything was up to scratch, my synopsis was written along the way, this was the overall write up of the story of my game.

Corpus Ingenii! is the name of the game. This is latin for 'Body of Ability!' I named it this because I thought with the player having the 'ability' to leave his 'body' and then venture into the soul world and then into another persons body it worked very well.

My personal effectiveness overall I think was very good because I managed to finish every piece of work on time and come up with an effective and original story with a storyboard and Script to go with it that was professionally done.

Peer Reflection

This is the storyboard and script feedback sheet that James Mason has filled in for me after reading through my work, it has helpful criticisms that I can use to make my work better.

It explains how I need to edit the layout of my work because it doesn't look completely professional.

It explains how I need to title my game because at the moment I do not have a title for it.

I think I have done well with the approach of the game because he didn't know what approach it could be which shows that it is an original idea that doesn't follow a set approach.

Overall I think the criticisms are helpful and will help me to change any issues in order to get a better overall grade.